United Supermarkets to roll out FlavoRx’s Fillmaster Plus dispensing technology
LUBBOCK, Texas — Texas-based supermarket operator United Supermarkets has teamed up with FlavoRx to roll out the Fillmaster Plus dispensing technology at all of the chain’s pharmacies.
Fillmaster Plus is a pharmacy device that automates drug reconstitution. How it works: When a prescription bottle is scanned using the Fillmaster Plus, the unit displays the medication’s name, volume, strength and the amount of purified water it needs for reconstitution. This process reduces the risk of dispensing errors and reconstitution is completed in a matter of seconds, FlavoRx said.
"United Supermarkets is making a strong statement with its investment in the Fillmaster Plus," FlavoRx president and CEO Stuart Amos said. “It says a lot about the company’s commitment to improving not only the lives of its customers, but of its employees behind the counter as well."
Report: Catalyst Rx case study justifies Walgreens PBM network inclusion
ROCKVILLE, Md. — Catalyst Rx, the pharmacy benefits management subsidiary of Catalyst Health Solutions, on Friday took out a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal touting the value of a Walgreens pharmacy to a large healthcare payer. Catalyst also released a case study touting that value, according to a DrugChannels.net report.
According to that case study, Walgreens achieved a generic utilization rate of 69% versus 67.7% for all other chains in the area, resulting in a cost-per-script savings of $3.30.
"Excluding Walgreens from the case study client pharmacy network would cause significant member disruption, create potential gaps in patient care and impact costs to the client, its employees, retirees and their dependents," Catalyst Rx stated. "As with all of our participating pharmacy partners, we recognize the services and the value delivered by Walgreens to its local community residents and are pleased to continue to include them in our network in 2012."
For a copy of the case study, click here.
Catalyst Rx in June completed its acquisition of Walgreens’ pharmacy benefit management subsidiary.
Medi-Cal reimbursement cuts of 10% opposed by pharmacy
ALEXANDRIA, Va. — The National Association of Chain Drug Stores and the National Community Pharmacists Association jointly spoke out Friday against cuts to California’s Medicaid program Medi-Cal, which will be retroactive to June 1.
“We are extremely disappointed with the unconscionable Medi-Cal reimbursement cuts proposed by the state and approved by HHS," the associations stated. "If left in place, we believe that these reductions would greatly harm millions of Californians by effectively reducing their access to community pharmacies and the healthcare system as a whole. The impact in terms of compromised health outcomes for patients or delayed access to needed services could be significant."
And that significance will be amplified in 2014, when another 3 million to 5 million Californians are expected to enroll into the Medi-Cal program through the Affordable Care Act. "The cuts approved by [the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] today are a complete contradiction to the ACA and makes you wonder if anybody between the Obama administration and Health and Human Services Agency are talking before these decisions are made,” stated Jon Roth, CEO for the California Pharmacists Association.
Specifically, three proposals expected to save $623 million collectively were approved last week:
A 10% provider payment reduction on a number of outpatient services, including physicians, clinics, optometrists, therapists, laboratories, dental, durable medical equipment and pharmacy;
A new 10% provider payment reduction for freestanding nursing and adult subacute facilities; and
A 10% provider payment reduction and rate freeze for distinct part/nursing facility-B services.
NACDS and NCPA outlined four points as to how the Medi-Cal cuts will generate negative outcomes:
First, community pharmacists provide expert medication advice and promote cost-saving generic drugs. … Patient access will likely suffer as many pharmacies may be forced to cease filling prescriptions and providing counseling to these patients for fear of jeopardizing their pharmacy’s financial viability;
Second, we believe that the Medi-Cal cuts will mean fewer jobs and local tax revenue at the worst possible time for the state’s economy. Pharmacy reimbursement by public and private health plans has already been declining for many years. These cuts could be the tipping point that forces community pharmacies to scale back operating hours, employee hours or to close altogether;
Third, these short-sighted cuts could very well backfire and ultimately increase costs for California and the federal government. Pharmacy services are arguably the best value in health care. As a result of the diminished pharmacy access these cuts will trigger, patients will likely either endure greater and costlier health problems or have to turn to more expensive providers, such as emergency rooms for the medication and counseling they need; and
In addition, it is surprising and disappointing that the federal and state officials involved have acted with such disregard to the judicial system, with a related case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. No one should presume the outcome of the case of Douglas v. Independent Living Center of California and the federal review of California’s proposed cuts should never have been concluded while the case is active.
The Douglas v. Independent Living Center questions whether Medicaid recipients and providers can sue a state that does not pay the reimbursement rate required by the Medicaid Act. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in that case Oct. 3. A transcript of those arguments are available here.
“Community pharmacists can work with states to reduce healthcare costs by eliminating needless medical expenses and increasing appropriate generic drug use," NACDS and NCPA stated. "As state and federal healthcare officials begin to realize the consequences of these actions, it is our hope that they will go back to the drawing board to develop a more practical budget approach.”