HEALTH

Legislation introduced to restore OTCs as qualified FSA/HSA reimbursements

BY Michael Johnsen

WASHINGTON — Four legislators on Thursday introduced legislation that would restore over-the-counter medicines as qualified reimbursements under health spending accounts and flexible spending accounts without a prescription. A provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act enacted in January had created a prescription requirement in order for OTC medicines to qualify for pre-tax reimbursements. 

Sens. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., and Ben Nelson, D-Neb., introduced the bill in the Senate; and Reps. Lynn Jenkins, R-Kan., and Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., introduced a similar bill to the House of Representatives.

“This prohibition takes away choice and flexibility from individuals about how to manage their healthcare expenses and adds yet another burden to physicians,” Roberts said. “Rather than promoting cost-effectiveness and accessibility, this provision directs people to potentially more costly, less convenient and more time-consuming alternatives.”

“Healthcare reform should be about increasing, not limiting, personal options and accessibility,” Jenkins added. “Medical savings accounts encourage personal ownership of one’s health care by giving individuals control over healthcare decisions and how to pay for that care. I am proud to help champion this bipartisan, bicameral bill in the House and hope our chamber will move quickly on this commonsense fix.”

Specifically, the legislation would repeal section 9003 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, restoring the ability of those participating in a medical savings account or other similar type of medical savings account to use the funds to purchase OTC medications without a doctor’s prescription.

“I have had patients complain about not being able to utilize their accounts for OTC products,” stated Brian Caswell, a member of the National Community Pharmacists Association executive committee. “I support this legislation because it will allow my patients to use their tax-preferred accounts on the OTC products they need at our independent pharmacy — without a prescription.”

“Over-the-counter medicines are often a first line of defense against ailments and injuries, and should be treated as medically reimbursable healthcare therapies, just like prescription medicines," commented Scott Melville, president and CEO for the Consumer Healthcare Products Association, which supports the legislation. "We urge Congress to reinstate a benefit that so many American families use to make medical expenses more affordable." The National Association of Chain Drug Stores also announced its support of the bipartisan legislation. 

According to a recent survey of consumers and primary care physicians, sponsored by the CHPA, primary care physicians estimated on average that 10% or more of visits to their offices were unnecessary and could have been avoided by self-management of health care, including the use of OTC medicines for minor ailments. In fact, according to the associated cost-savings study, $5.2 billion could be saved by consumers and taxpayers annually, if only half of the unnecessary visits were avoided by greater self-management of health care, including the use of OTC medicines.

Nearly 50 million Americans participate in FSAs and other health savings accounts. The accounts allow individuals to set aside their own money each year on a pre-tax basis to pay for such healthcare expenses as co-payments and other healthcare expenses not covered by insurance, prescriptions or over-the-counter medications.

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

TRENDING STORIES

Polls

Which area of the industry do you think Amazon’s entry would shake up the most?
HEALTH

Colon Cancer Alliance raises awareness in Denver with ‘Undy’ run

BY Michael Johnsen

DENVER — The Colon Cancer Alliance’s Denver Undy 5000 5K run held at City Park last month had more than 1,300 people wearing underwear, boxer shorts or silly costumes helping to bring greater awareness to colon cancer, the second-leading cause of cancer death in the United States.

“Denver has done it again,” stated Andrew Spiegel, CEO of the Colon Cancer Alliance. “The Undy 5000 was a great success. We had 74 survivors in attendance who were recognized for their valiant effort in beating this disease. And, to top it off, Denver supporters helped us raise more than $130,000.” That marks the third consecutive year that the Undy 5000 5K run eclipsed the $100,000 mark in raised funds.

Event proceeds are used to support and build the Colon Cancer Alliance’s national and local patient support and public awareness programs. In addition, a portion of the proceeds from the Denver Undy 5000 will go to the Colorado Colorectal Screening Program at the University of Colorado Cancer Center to fund services for individuals diagnosed with colon cancer.

The maker of Dulcolax is the presenting sponsor of the 2011 Undy 5000 races. As the No.-1 doctor-recommended stimulant for constipation relief, Dulcolax reminded everyone over the age of 50 years or those with a family history of colon cancer that a colonoscopy can save lives.

Additional national sponsors included the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Amgen, Genentech and Salix Pharmaceuticals. Local sponsors included Arapahoe Gastroenterology, RMGA, South Denver Gastroenterology, Diversified Radiology of Colorado, The Cancer Center Lutheran Medical Center, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Saint Joseph Hospital, Ah-Some Photography and Tony’s Market.

More information about the Undy 5000 is available online at Undy5000.org.

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

TRENDING STORIES

Polls

Which area of the industry do you think Amazon’s entry would shake up the most?
HEALTH

Court affirms decision that Watson Pharmaceuticals’ generic versions of Mucinex products do not infringe on any patents

BY Michael Johnsen

PARSIPPANY, N.J. — Watson Pharmaceuticals last week confirmed that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has affirmed the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida’s February 2011 decision that Watson’s generic versions of Mucinex, Mucinex D and Mucinex DM extended-release products do not infringe Reckitt Benckiser’s U.S. Patent No. 6,372,252. 

Watson stated it is continuing to seek final approval of the products from the Food and Drug Administration. 

In 2009, Reckitt Benckiser sued Watson for patent infringement related to Watson’s filing of three abbreviated new drug applications for generic versions of Reckitt’s Mucinex line of products. The Mucinex products had total U.S. sales of approximately $500 million for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2010, Watson noted, citing SymphonyIRI Group data. 

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

TRENDING STORIES

Polls

Which area of the industry do you think Amazon’s entry would shake up the most?