- Facing pharmacy trends for the remainder of the year
- Rite Aid posts third consecutive quarterly profit as company expands Wellness+
- Senate passes Drug Quality and Security Act
- NACDS, NCPA, GPhA express support for Drug Quality and Security Act
- State of the market: Are generic drugs approaching their peak?
NEW YORK — The state supreme court in Alabama ruled that brand-name drug companies could be sued if patients suffer complications from generic versions of their medicines, according to published reports.
According to The New York Times, an Alabama man named Danny Weeks claimed he developed tardive dyskinesia after taking generic versions of Pfizer's acid reflux drug Reglan (metoclopramide). Pfizer acquired rights to the drug when it bought Wyeth in 2009, and generic drug makers Teva and Actavis, now owned by Watson, make generic versions.
Weeks had originally filed the suit in federal court, but the court asked the Alabama Supreme Court to determine if Weeks could sue the branded drug makers.
Under Food and Drug Administration regulations, generic versions of branded drugs must use the same safety labeling as the branded versions, and the Times noted that a 2011 Supreme Court decision, Pliva v. Mensing, determined that generic drug companies had no control over what drug labels said, meaning they could be sued for failing to inform patients of safety risks.